Author Guidelines

The publication of articles in LexSociety Journal of Law and Social Politics is a critical foundation for developing a coherent and respected knowledge network. It reflects the quality of the authors’ work and the institutions that support them. Published articles uphold and adhere to the scientific method, making it essential to agree on ethical standards for all parties involved in the publishing process, including authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.

Inspira Publisher, as the publisher of LexSociety Journal of Law and Social Politics, is committed to overseeing all stages of publication with diligence and recognizing its ethical and professional responsibilities. Beyond its commitment, the publisher ensures that editorial decisions remain independent of commercial influences such as advertising or other revenue sources. The publisher also fosters communication with other journal managers or publishers when necessary and beneficial.

Publishing Decisions

The editors of LexSociety are responsible for deciding which articles are suitable for publication. These decisions are driven by the validation of the work and its relevance to researchers and readers. Editors are guided by the journal's editorial policies and legal requirements related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. They may consult with other editors or the review team during the decision-making process.

Fair Treatment

Manuscripts are evaluated solely on their intellectual content, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff are required to maintain confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts, sharing information only with the corresponding author, peer reviewers, and publishers as appropriate.

Conflict of Interest and Disclosure

Unpublished material disclosed in a manuscript must not be used by editors for their own research without the express written consent of the author.

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviewers provide essential input to assist editors in making decisions on submitted manuscripts. Their feedback also helps authors improve their work through constructive suggestions and guidance.

Timeliness

Reviewers who feel unqualified to assess a manuscript or unable to review it promptly should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the review process.

Confidentiality for Reviewers

Manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shared or discussed with anyone without explicit authorization from the editor.

Objectivity in Review

Reviews must be conducted impartially, focusing on the manuscript's content without personal criticism of the authors. Reviewers should provide their opinions clearly, supported by sound arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers must identify any relevant work that has not been cited by the authors. Statements of previously reported findings must include appropriate references. Reviewers should also notify the editor of any significant overlap between the manuscript under review and other published works.

Conflict of Interest for Reviewers

Confidential information obtained through peer review must not be used for personal gain. Reviewers must decline to assess manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any author, institution, or entity associated with the manuscript.

Reporting Standards

Authors must present an accurate account of the research performed, along with an objective discussion of its significance. Data should be represented truthfully and comprehensively to enable others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are considered unethical and unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure their work is entirely original. If they use the work or words of others, these must be properly cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors must not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously or publish substantially similar research in multiple journals. Such behavior is unethical and unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of others' contributions must always be provided. Authors should cite publications that have significantly influenced their work.

Authorship

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All significant contributors must be listed as co-authors, while others involved in the research project should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author must ensure that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript and agreed to its submission for publication.

Conflict of Interest and Disclosure by Authors

Authors must disclose any financial or substantive conflicts of interest that might influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the research must be declared.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

If authors identify significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, they must immediately notify the editor or publisher and cooperate to correct or retract the article as necessary.